Skip to content
Telangana Social

Sarcasm as a Social Service. The SaaS Telangana didn’t ask for but needs.

Talk to us

Today's talking point

the Assembly gate clash

Analysis

Section 22-A mess gets two protest dates

The Telangana BJP wants a white paper on private properties listed as prohibited, while the Congress government admits errors and promises corrections. The alleged mega-scam remains, for now, a political number without a ledger.

By Ctrl Alt DebatePoliticsHyderabad
WhatsApp
A giant prohibited-properties map marked Survey 403 covers a tiny plot beside an empty ledger, oversized claim papers weigh down one side of a scale, and a correction stamp hovers outside a Telangana government office.

The Section 22-A list is under review, while the larger claims await a ledger.

Illustration generated from an editorial brief

The Telangana BJP will hold protests at Indira Park on September 5 and 6 over private properties appearing on the Section 22-A prohibited-properties list. BJP Legislature Party leader Alleti Maheshwar Reddy demanded a white paper and threatened to “storm the Assembly” if corrective action does not begin. BJP state president N. Ramachander Rao also cited properties in Kukatpally and Arutla, though the specific land claims were not independently verified in the material reviewed. (Source: report published August 27.)

The underlying problem is real enough without the added arithmetic. The Telangana government has acknowledged that some genuine properties were wrongly listed. Revenue Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy said Survey No. 403, covering 1,288 acres, was listed in full even though he said only two plots had an issue. The government says it will correct eligible cases and publish additions made since December 7, 2023. Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy has also said survey numbers would be subdivided where only part was affected.

The High Court has sought the government’s response after petitioners complained that an updated Section 22-A list was not reliably available online. The court said details of prohibited agricultural lands should be public. That is the useful demand here: publish the records. The BJP’s “lakhs of crores” claim, the alleged ₹15,000-crore transfer and the alleged ₹200-crore monthly payments to Delhi remain unsubstantiated allegations. The list is under review; so, apparently, is the evidence.

More stories

Editorial standards