Skip to content

Talking pointTelangana's voter-roll tug-of-war

The ColumnIndia / APSatire · opinion

Andhra’s Democracy Filed 22,800 Forms and Lost 16

The coalition has discovered a modern test of democracy: count the paperwork, ignore the stones, guns and missing papers.

Chandrababu Naidu’s TDP-led Andhra governmentWhatsApp
A politician counts a huge stack of nomination forms at an oversized filing counter while a smaller blocked submission window and torn forms sit beside a waiting candidate.
Counting the forms is not the same as protecting the filing process.

Andhra Pradesh’s ruling coalition has found a revolutionary way to measure democracy: count the nomination forms and avoid looking at what happened to some of them on the way to the counter.

Nara Lokesh reportedly pointed to more than 22,800 nominations as proof that “democracy in Andhra Pradesh is alive and thriving”. A fine statistic, provided democracy is defined as a clerical exercise in which the surviving paperwork is counted and the surrounding violence is filed under atmospheric conditions.

The police record is less lyrical. DGP Harish Kumar Gupta said 31 election-related incidents were reported across 13 districts in a single day: 22 cases of violence or public disorder, nine incidents involving nomination papers being snatched or torn, attacks on police, four vehicles set on fire and further instances of papers being damaged or destroyed. The State Election Commission extended the nomination window in four urban local bodies after the process was disrupted. The Supreme Court had also directed election authorities to address complaints that YSRCP candidates were being prevented from filing nominations.

There were rival accusations, as there always are in Andhra politics. TDP and YSRCP blamed each other, while one TDP leader reportedly had a gun seized after alleged firing during a factional clash. This is apparently what passes for a healthy electoral environment when the government’s preferred response is to point at the other side and announce that the spreadsheet looks encouraging.

Chandrababu Naidu’s government cannot have it both ways. If the violence was serious enough for the election authorities to pause the process, extend deadlines and deploy more force, then the administration failed to protect the election. If it was too minor to matter, the government should explain why the machinery of the state treated it as an emergency. The number of nominations proves only that some candidates reached the counter. It does not prove they got there freely, safely or without papers being snatched on the route.

This is not democratic confidence. It is administrative evasion dressed as a success metric. A government that cannot guarantee an opposition candidate the basic right to submit a nomination has no standing to deliver lectures on democratic legitimacy.

In Andhra Pradesh, democracy is alive and thriving; it is just waiting for police protection to submit its nomination papers.

More from The Column