Skip to content
Telangana Social

Sarcasm as a Social Service. The SaaS Telangana didn’t ask for but needs.

Talk to us

Today's talking point

the Assembly gate clash

Analysis

22A list row is real; ‘massive scam’ isn’t — yet

Bhu Bharati has a grievance route, the law bars assigned-land transfers, and the minister says wrongful entries will be removed. The louder claims — thousands of acres quietly flipped — are unproven on today’s record.

By Ctrl Alt DebateGovernment
WhatsApp
A Telangana-style revenue office records desk weighs a labelled 22A file and objection box against a large question-mark loudspeaker sitting on unverified papers.

The 22A correction route is documented; the larger allegations still require documents.

Illustration generated from an editorial brief

Telangana’s Section 22A fight is on the record. The official Bhu Bharati portal shows a live workflow to contest wrongful inclusion in the prohibited-properties list, and the Revenue Department’s own compendium notes that assigned lands have been mistakenly clubbed under 22A before, with procedures to fix it.

What is not on the record: the leap from administrative error to a grand land grab. A report doing the rounds alleges 3,000–4,000 acres in Maheshwaram were informally tied up, 47 acres in Mankhal were flipped from assigned to patta, and specific survey numbers in Srinagar were targeted — but it names no buyers, files no documents, and leans on unnamed “sources”. On that evidence, “massive scam” is a slogan, not a finding.

The law is not vague here. The Telangana Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 bars transfers of assigned land, and any private paper that imagines otherwise does not beat statute. The minister’s stated line matches that: “No eligible person will face injustice over 22A lands,” and wrongly listed parcels will be removed after verification once details are online. That is a promise the government can be held to, because Bhu Bharati has the objection pipe built in.

The politics, of course, has arrived. Critics are waving thousands-of-acres claims without a single certified pahani, mutation order or file noting. If the Congress-run administration’s opponents want the “scam” tag to stick, they need documents, not decibels. If the BJP wants to join the chorus, it can start by reading the 1977 Act it likes to quote elsewhere.

What would settle this fast: district-wise before/after 22A lists with dates and legal categories, certified extracts for the named survey numbers, the alleged 47-acre Mankhal proceedings, and any officer action. Until then, the only solid thing is the correction mechanism and the minister’s assurance — and the Congress side’s heat without the paperwork to match.

More stories

Editorial standards