Skip to content
Telangana Social

Sarcasm as a Social Service. The SaaS Telangana didn’t ask for but needs.

Talk to us

Today's talking point

the Assembly gate clash

Analysis

Centre’s “not appropriate” tour guide

UK okay, US “not appropriate”. Telangana’s Chief Minister flew back from London after the BJP‑led Centre blocked his US leg — and still hasn’t shown the rulebook it used.

By Ctrl Alt DebateRealityHyderabad
WhatsApp
Two identical travel folders sit on an office desk: the UK folder is stamped cleared, while the US folder is blocked by red tape beside a chained rulebook.

The UK leg was cleared; the US leg was denied without a published assessment.

Illustration generated from an editorial brief

The Telangana delegation’s UK–US outreach began on 20 August. The UK leg went ahead with meetings at Oxford and with potential education and research partners, recorded by the state’s own releases. The US leg did not: Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy returned to Hyderabad instead of flying to Boston after the BJP‑led Centre refused political clearance for the CM in the United States. According to reports quoting the MEA, the programme “was not so” appropriate to the office and purpose — while, “incidentally”, the UK was cleared.

Revanth called the block “political grounds” in posts from London and said the trip was to bring global institutions to Telangana. The MEA spokesperson, quoted on the record, offered only the “appropriateness” line. Government-source briefings have since floated that proposed US meetings — including with JD Vance and New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani — were a factor, and that this was a “technical” decision. The CM’s office called the Mamdani meeting tentative and said there was no official exchange with his office. None of this is a published file.

Two facts stand: the UK was approved; the US was denied. The delegation was told to continue US engagements without the CM to pursue MoUs with institutions like Harvard, MIT, Northeastern and Virginia Tech. If the BJP‑led Centre has a standard that makes Oxford “appropriate” and Boston “not so”, it can publish the assessment and the itinerary it judged. Until then, “incidentally” reads like an alibi, not an explanation.

More stories

Editorial standards